OK – setting the record straight on brainstorming
Crawling into of blogging again (and into the wider world –
it’s been intense lately). What made me crawl out? This post by Marc Andreessen and the ensuing discussions that erupted around the web because
of it…
Marc wrote a post called Brainstorming Sucks and then put up
a quote from my book to prove why. I really like that specific quote and in
essence it talks about how brainstorming in a group tends to produce far fewer
ideas than doing so individually. Brainstorming, as a technique, has been researched
in at least 25 separate studies around the world and, it turns out, a group of
people has never managed to outdo the
same number of individuals separately trying to generate ideas. Wow. Or – to
sum it up: brainstorming must be one of
the most hyped idea generation techniques in the world.
Well – Marc’s post generated a lot of other comments around
the web (such here
and here ). Many folks started smiling I
am sure (as I have heard people say they did when reading that passage in the
book) because they somehow recognized brainstorming’s lousy track record. How
many useless brainstorming sessions have there been since the technique started
spreading? Don’t know, exactly - but a lot.
Yet not everyone agreed. Some folks (such as here
and here)
argued that brainstorming can be very effective. Among the proponents, it turns out ... ME! Yes – indeed – only a few sentences
later I talk about how effective it can get. A brainstorm done right can be insanely
useful. It is the basis for how the most innovative teams get great ideas
going, evolving and even executed. There are a number of ways to create
super-productive brainstormers (and there are folks that focus on exactly that).
In The Medici Effect I looked at some
reasons for why brainstorming can be difficult to pull off – but also what you
can do to make it successful. Yes - it does require a great facilitator, some prep work, and
preferably some great tools (various lateral thinking techniques can be quite
useful) along with a high pace and good momentum. With these things in place,
however, a brainstorm will ROCK and I can’t recommend it more.
There.
Frans: much thanks for speaking up and putting the quote from your book back into the context it came from :)
Posted by: Scott Berkun | August 17, 2007 at 09:31 PM
Brainstorming is simply one tool for creative problem solving. The more tools in your toolbelt for solving problems (that you're skilled at using), the better the result.
Matching the right tool for the right problem is the mark of of a skilled creative craftsperson.
Posted by: Jay Hamilton-Roth | August 20, 2007 at 10:32 AM
Thanks for putting your quote in context. The blog definitely produced a lot of buzz and hubbub. I am glad you agree that when brainstorming is done right it can be very effective. We have often generated 700-1000 ideas in just a few hours with skilled brainstormers.
Keep up the research!
Posted by: Julia Styles | August 21, 2007 at 05:05 PM
Thanks for the email, and for clearing things up with the quoted passage. Good to finally hear your response.
Posted by: gwalker | August 24, 2007 at 08:46 AM
When it comes to brainstorming, my feeling is that while you can certainly generate a lot of ideas individually, the quality of ideas that you can generate with 1-2 other smart, creative people is an order of magnitude higher.
I know that when I have a conversation with Frans, it's a lot more creative than simply thinking to myself!
Posted by: Chris Yeh | August 25, 2007 at 01:56 PM